Real, truthful news and fake, false news differ dramatically in quality and reliability, although it can be difficult to clearly distinguish between them in many online environments. The following activities are designed to develop your skills and perspectives as a fake news investigator and critical news evaluator.
People get news today from sources ranging from television, social media (e.g., Twitter, TikTok) and legacy news outlets (i.e., New York Times, Washington Post) as well as teachers, parents, family members, and peers. Yet, there is a real difference in quality and reliability between real news and fake news.
Fake news resembles real news in form (it typically has headlines, images, quotes, and a news-like look on screens), but not in how it is produced organizationally. Real news is derived following the standards and rules of journalism. It is fact-based and fact-checked from verified sources. It is presented objectively and truthfully in a journalistic style of writing. It is independent of political or corporate influences. Fake news, by contrast, is just what the term says -- information that is intentionally false and misleading (Molina, et al., 2021).
Given the amount of fake and false news online and in print, every individual must become their own fact checker and news analyst - determining for themselves what is credible and reliable information and what is fake and false misinformation.
Pick a topic that you don’t know much about. Spend 20 minutes investigating and researching it. Find out anything and everything about this topic.
Then, look through your search history.
What words did you use in your search?
What sorts of news sources did you tend to seek out?
What did you find the most or least valuable during your search process?
How did you determine whether a source was credible or not?
Create a mindmap that provides a visual overview of your search process (see examples below).
Include boxes on your mindmap for each site you visited. Add details to each box, such as whether you consider the site credible and what you learned from the site.
How do you determine if a news story or social media news post contains misinformation?
What would you tell someone who didn’t know anything about how to tell if a source is credible to look for when evaluating news articles and social media posts?
How would you explain credible news sources to your parents, grandparents, siblings, or friends?
Create a rubric, checklist, or other instructional tool (e.g., podcast, video) to help others evaluate news sources (see example mindmap below).
Designing for Learning: Student-Created Activity Example
Example News Evaluation Tool by Sophia Hajjar:
Activity 3: Evaluate the Benefits and Challenges of Getting Political News on Social Media to a Democratic Society
Nearly half of adults ages 18 to 29 in this country get their political news mostly on social media. The figure is 1-in-5 across all age groups. Those getting political news from social media also tend to be less well-informed about political issues and policies (Pew Research Center, July 30, 2020).
Conduct Internet research and survey friends and family about the potential benefits and drawbacks of getting news from social media. Specifically, consider the following prompts:
What do you see as the potential benefits of getting news from social media?
What might be the potential drawbacks of getting news from social media?
What can be done to address these drawbacks?
How does getting news from social media influence democracy?
Design a news report video to share your findings.
Designing for Learning: Student-Created Activity Example
Activity 4: Investigate Twitter's Blue Check Verification Policy
Twitter (now X) was an important source of political news for many social media users, and the nature of information on the site has changed dramatically since Elon Musk became owner and CEO in late October 2022. Musk changed the site's "blue check" verification policy that previously served as a way for users to confirm that authentic information came from actual people or organizations.
Many individuals and organizations have refused to do so, and, as a result, it has become even easier for those posting on Twitter to impersonate other people, to claim to be a public agency or local politican or government official, or to present totally false and politically damaging information. Essentially anyone can post anything and users are left to decide for themselves what is true and what is not.
As a class, create your own system for verifying the trustworthiness of the people and organizations on Twitter.
How would you go about identifying authentic versus deceptive and unreliable users on Twitter?
How would you go about differentiating between real users and bots?
Which people and organizations should you trust on Twitter for finding political news? Why should you trust them?
Evaluate the benefits and challenges of digital news and social media to a democratic society. (Massachusetts Curriculum Framework for History and Social Studies) [8.T7.4]