ARCS Model of Curiosity
One way to increase your students’ motivation to learn and love of learning is to use the ARCS curiosity model developed by John Keller(2010). The ARCS model defines curiosity as a product of attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. The ARCS curiosity model can be implemented into any curriculum. Hattie and Zierer (2018) argue that it is the role of the teacher “to set the tone in the class and to motivate students, not vice versa” and that this can be accomplished using strategies from the ARCS model (p. 50).
A lesson that stimulates ATTENTION harnesses students’ curiosity and interest. A RELEVANT lesson is driven by relating to students’ diverse needs and experiences. A lesson that builds CONFIDENCE involves scaffolding meaningful tasks and a lesson that prompts SATISFACTION builds students’ sense of achievement. Each factor is a prerequisite for the others. Without sustained attention, students won’t be able to understand the relevance of a subject to their lives. Relevance builds confidence which in turn leads to greater satisfaction.
We can increase attention by introducing the subject and presenting the material in an engaging way. We can increase relevance by giving students choice, helping them understand how this knowledge is applicable in their lives, or by “introducing a curiosity-arousing situation which has at least some familiarity to the learner (that is, the learner already has some knowledge about it)” (Arnone & Small, 1995, p. 9). We can increase students’ confidence by selecting appropriate challenges and building positive expectations. Lastly, we can increase students’ satisfaction by helping them recognize the feelings of accomplishment and pleasure that come from learning new things. A list of additional ways to practice the ARCS model in your classroom is included below. Guided questions taken from Keller (2010,2016). Learning strategies adapted from Keller (2010) and LearningTheories(2022).
|Guiding Questions for Educators||Learning Strategies|
Activities that involve novelty, inquiry and variety such as: humor, puzzles, games, roleplay, problem-solving, brainstorming, mind-mapping, audiovisual content, varying presentation, discussion, storytelling.
||Activities that align with students’ goals, needs and experiences such as: modeling, building on prior skills, providing examples that students will recognize, having students give examples from personal experiences, have students ask themselves “How will the subject matter help me today?...tomorrow?”, student choice, guest speakers.|
||Activities that involve goal-oriented scaffolding such as: allowing students to choose goals, providing small and manageable steps for goal achievement, consistent feedback and praise, student choice in assessment of learning.|
||Activities that foster intrinsic and extrinsic motivation such as: providing some external rewards but avoid over-rewarding, providing frequent constructive feedback, giving students certificates for skill mastery, and having prior students share their learning experiences. Praise and feedback should be equitable. Praise should be effort focused, rather than ability focused.|
Does it work?
Feng and Tuan (2005) assessed the effectiveness of integrating the ARCS model into chemistry lessons on high school students’ motivation and engagement in the lessons. Fifty-one 11th grade students participated, half assigned to the lessons using the ARCS model and the other half to a control group with traditional lecture-style lessons. Students in the ARCS model classroom reported higher levels of learning motivation following the intervention. Students had a greater sense of self-efficacy and confidence, more frequent use of active learning strategies, and a deeper understanding of the value of science learning. Also, students reported an improved ability to pay attention and be engaged for the duration of the class period (Feng & Tuan, 2005). A meta-analysis of 38 controlled experiment studies of ARCs model use in classroom instruction, with a total effect size of over 8000 students from grades K-12 and higher education, also found that the ARCS model has a positive effect on both student motivation and academic achievement (Gosku & Islam Bolat, 2021).
Arnone, M. P. & Small, R. V. (1995). Arousing and sustaining curiosity: Lessons from the ARCS model. Proceedings of the 1995 Annual National Convention of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology. https://edtechbooks.org/-GXqm
Feng, S.L., Tuan, H.L.(2005). Using ARCS model to promote 11th graders' motivation and achievement in learning about acids and bases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 463–484. https://edtechbooks.org/-EvCK
Goksu, I., & Islam Bolat, Y. (2021). Does the ARCS motivational model affect students’ achievement and motivation? A meta‐analysis. Review of Education, 9(1), 27-52. https://edtechbooks.org/-ghDT
Hattie, J. & Zierer, K. (2018). 10 mindframes for visible learning: Teaching for success. New York: Routledge.
Keller, J. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. London: Springer. https://edtechbooks.org/-LeJA
Keller, J. M. (2016). Motivation, learning, and technology: Applying the ARCS-V motivation model. Participatory Educational Research, 3(2), 1-15.
LearningTheories (2022). ARCS model of motivational design theories (Keller). https://edtechbooks.org/-aToD
CC BY-NC: This work is released under a CC BY-NC license, which means that you are free to do with it as you please as long as you (1) properly attribute it and (2) do not use it for commercial gain.
End-of-Chapter Survey: How would you rate the overall quality of this chapter?
- Very Low Quality
- Low Quality
- Moderate Quality
- High Quality
- Very High Quality