2.4

Debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Standard 2.4:  Debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Compare and contrast key ideas debated between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists over ratification of the Constitution (e.g., federalism, factions, checks and balances, independent judiciary, republicanism, limited government). (Massachusetts Curriculum Framework for History and Social Science) [8.T2.4]

FOCUS QUESTION: What Were the Key Points of Debate Between Federalists and Anti-Federalists?

An Advertisement for the Federalist 1787

"An Advertisement for the Federalist" | Public Domain

In response to the flaws in a government that was operating under The Articles of Confederation, the Constitution was proposed, created, and sent to the states for ratification. To become law, the new Constitution had to be ratified (meaning approved) by 9 of 13 states (as required by Article VII).

State legislatures were directed to call ratification conventions to debate and then approve or reject the new framework for the national government. Despite unhappiness over the Articles of Confederation, there was significant opposition to the new Constitution and its approval was very much in doubt in many states.

The debate over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution is known for the sharp divide it created among people in the newly independent states. Two groups, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, emerged with the Federalists arguing for ratification and the Anti-Federalists arguing against the ratification. Federalist supporters of the Constitution included James Madison, Alexander Hamiton, and John Jay, the authors of the Federalist Papers. Anti-Federalist opponents included George Clinton, Patrick Henry, and James Monroe (the future 5th President).

The new Constitution was finally approved on June 21, 1788 when New Hamsphire became the 9th state to ratify (The Day the Constitution Was Ratified).

What were the main disagreements between Federalists and Anti-Federalists? The modules for this topic outline the two sides, the role of women in the debates, and how those disagreements are still impacting our lives and our politics today.

    1.INVESTIGATE: The Federalist-Anti-Federalist Debates 

    The Federalists believed that the Constitution would create a needed change in the structure of government. In their view, the Articles had created disarray through a system where state governments competed with one another for power and control. Federalists hoped the Constitution would establish a strong central government that could enforce laws of states, get things done, and maintain the union. It would create stability and the promise of growth as a unified nation. Key examples of the views of Federalists can be found in Federalist Paper Number 10 and Federalist Papers Numbers 1, 9, 39, 51, and 78.

    The Anti-Federalists feared the Constitution would create a central government that would act like a monarchy with little protection for civil liberties. Anti-Federalists favored power for state governments where public debate and citizen awareness had opportunities to influence and direct state and national policies. Important primary sources for Anti-Federalists include The Federal Farmer I, Brutus I, and the Speech of Patrick Henry (June 5, 1788).

    The divide was intense and in most states, ratification of the new Constitution just barely happened. The Massachusetts vote, held on February 6, 1788, was 187 for ratification; 168 against.

    Media Literacy Connections: Political Debates Through Songs from the Musical Hamilton

    Hamilton: An American Musical written by Lin-Manuel Miranda tells the story of Alexander Hamilton and the founding of the United States using hip hop, R&B, pop, and soul music as well as Broadway-style show tunes. It opened in February 2105, and won the 2016 Pulitzer Prize for Drama as well as numerous Tony Awards that same year. The show's writer described it as about "America then, as told by America now" (The Atlantic, September 29, 2015, para. 2).

    • Step 1: Listen to the songs from Hamilton listed below at least twice. The first time should just be a listen without reading the lyrics. Feel free to gather general impressions. The second time should be listened to while reading the lyrics. Feel free to take a look at the way that Genius analyzes the lyrics after forming your own opinions and takeaways.
    • Step 2: Consider the following questions and discuss:
      • Are these songs factual? To what degree? Do they leave anything out? How do they complement what you’ve learned in social studies classes?
      • How is Manuel-Miranda able to make these historical moments contemporary? How is Manuel-Miranda able to utilize music & lyrics to convey history accurately? 
      • Does seeing history in a more contemporary light aid your learning? How can this be applied to other disciplines and/or mediums?
      • What parallels can you draw between the points Hamilton and Jefferson bring up in these cabinet battles and contemporary political issues/debates?

    Additional resources:

    Suggested Learning Activities

    • Argue a Federalist and an Anti-Federalist Position
      • Minimum Wage Laws
      • Early Voting Days and Times
      • Motorcycle Helmet Laws and Traffic Speed Limits
      • Environmental Protections and Air Quality
      • Should States or the Federal Government Have Primary Authority to Make Decisions about the Following Policies:

    Online Resources on Federalists and Anti-Federalists

    2.UNCOVER: Abigail Adams, Mercy Otis Warren, and the Political Roles of Women

    While men did the writing of the Constitution, the voices of women were heard in the debates over ratification and the rights of citizens. 

    Abigail Adams was an advocate for women’s rights, supporter of education for women, and active opponent of slavery. She was also the wife of future President John Adams and mother of President John Quicy Adams. Her "Remember the Ladies" letter to husband John Adams is a famous document from the time.

    You can read more of her writing at About the Correspondence Between John & Abigail Adams, from the Massachusetts Historical Society.

    Abigail Adams First Spouse Coin

    "Abigail Adams 'Remember the Ladies' Coin" | Public Domain

    Mercy Otis Warren, from Barnstable and Plymouth Massachusetts, was a poet, playwright, and essayist whose writing was strongly political - a dramatic departure from how women were supposed to behave at the time.

    Mercy Otis Warren circa 1763

    "Portrait of Mercy Otis Warren"
    by John Singleton Copley | Public Domain

    Mercy Otis Warren has been described as “the leading female intellectual of the Revolution and early republic” (Michals, 2015, para. 1; National Women's History Museum). Warren was both an outspoken supporter of the American Revolution and a strong Anti-Federalist opponent of the Constitution. Like other anti-federalists, her opposition to the new government ranged from the "lack of a bill of rights guaranteeing freedom of the press and the rights of individuals, to the indirect, antidemocratic method for electing the president" (Brown & Tager, 2000, p. 108).

    Mercy Otis Warren wrote many political pieces under the pseudonym ‘A Columbian Patriot' in support of the Anti-Federalist ideals. Explore her writing at: "Observations on the new Constitution, and on the foederal and state conventions. By a Columbian patriot. ; Sic transit gloria Americana." 

    Suggested Learning Activities

    • Analyze a Video
      • Watch the video: The Founding Mothers of the United States: An Overview in which journalist Cokie Roberts and author Walter Isaacson discuss the life and times of Martha Washington, Deborah Franklin, and Mercy Otis Warren.
      • What roles did these women play in the beginning of the United States?

    Online Resources for the Political Roles of Women in the Early United States

    3. Engage: Who Should Have Primary Responsibility for Environmental Policies?

    In fulfilling a 2016 campaign pledge to create more business- and industry-friendly policies (especially for fossil-fuel and nuclear-power companies), the Presidential Administration of Donald Trump has dramatically altered the environmental policies of the federal government.

    The Department of the Interior and other federal branch agencies have loosened or eliminated rules and regulations put in place by previous Presidents, rolling back offshore drilling safety regulations, greenlighting oil and gas pipeline projects, granting energy companies access to wildlife habitats, permitting increased logging of federal forests, and easing restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions from coal power plants, among other changes (A Running List of How President Trump is Changing Environmental Policy, National Geographic, 2017; updated 2019; Trump v. Earth, National Resources Defense Council, 2020).

    Deregulation policies included replacing the Clean Power Plan, revising and weakening the Endangered Species Act, Coal Ash Rule, the Mercury and Air Toxic Standards, and reversing bans on the use of pesticides in farming (The Trump Administration's Major Environmental Deregulations, Brookings, December 15, 2020). You can follow changes in environmental rules and policies with a Climate Deregulation Tracker from the Sabin Center for Climate Change at Columbia University School of Law.

    Declining Arctic Sea Ice 1979-2010

    "Declining Arctic Sea Ice, 1979-2010"
    Public Domain

    The Trump Administration's environmental policies have placed the federal government in direct and contentious opposition to numerous state governments. That state governments have a central role in environmental policy has been established in court, namely Massachusetts v. EPA (2006), a landmark climate change case where the Supreme Court ruled that a state government had the authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate auto emissions. That decision was written by Justice John Paul Stevens who wrote a number of significiant environmental decisions during his time on the Court; he died in 2019 at the age of 99.

    Trump policies have led to direct conflicts with states, notably California which has enacted stricter environmental protection laws than most of the rest of the states in the country (California sues Trump again for revoking state’s authority to limit auto emissions). Here is the latest example of the historic tension in American politics between states’ rights and federal power—a tension that goes all the way back to the Articles of Confederation. 

    The federal government’s first major role in setting environment policy was establishing Yellowstone National Park in 1872 (the world’s first national park). However, it did so on lands that native tribes consider sacred, adding another source of dispute between American Indians and the U.S. government (Yellowstone National Park Created on Sacred Land).  

    The National Park Service was created in 1916. Following the publication of Rachel Carson’s seminal book Silent Spring (1962), Congress passed the Clean Air Acts of 1963, 1970 and 1990 along with the Clean Water Act in 1972. There is more historical background and information at a resourcesforhistoryteachers wiki page, The Clean Air Act. Following the first Earth Day (1970), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established in 1970. As President, Barack Obama took numerous steps to extend environmental protections (Mother Nature Network, 2016).

    Earth from Space 2010

    Earth From Space, 2010
    "Earth Day - Earth from Space" by TheOriginalSoni is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0

    Suggested Learning Activities

    • Design a Sustainability Ambassador Role for You and/or Others
      • Propose this role for yourself, another student, or group of students as a school, classroom, or family sustainability ambassador.
      • What steps could that person(s) take to improve air and water quality, food safety, waste reduction, and other environmental and climate justice concerns.
      • Design a poster or short video explaining the role and its goals.
    • Write a Public Policy Brief
      • What are the limits of states’ rights and federal power in matters related to the environment?  
      • Can states block federal directives?  
      • Can the federal government ignore state laws?
      • Should state governments or the federal government have primary responsibility for modern-day environmental policy? 
    • Learn Online: Preventing Natural Disasters
      • Play Stop Disasters, a group of digital games from the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction where players must try to avert natural disasters - tsunamis, wildfires, hurricanes, earthquakes and floods - from happening.
        • How successful were you in preventing a disaster? 
        • What did you learn about environmental policy choices from playing one of these games?

    Online Resources for States Rights vs. Federal Power in Modern-Day Environmental Politics

    Standard 2.4 Conclusion

    During the writing of the Constitution, Federalists and Anti-Federalists offered sharply diverging visions for the roles of state and federal government, differences which have continued in American politics to the present day. INVESTIGATE outlined the main points of the Federalist-Anti-Federalist debates. UNCOVER examined the political roles of women through the actions of Abigail Adams and Mercy Otis Warren. ENGAGE placed the debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists in a modern-day context by asking what level of government should have primary responsibilty for environmental policies?