Online mentoring elevates the classic art of mentoring (Shandley, 1989; Jacobi, 1991; Ehrich et al., 2004) into the modern world of technology and innovation. While foundational mentoring principles still apply to online mentoring, definitions are also evolving. In early online mentoring research, traditional mentoring models were adjusted to be successfully implemented online (Hamilton & Scandura, 2003; Whiting & de Jansz, 2004), but foundational research focused specifically upon online mentoring was missing (Sanyal & Rigby, 2017). More contemporary definitions offer a simplified explanation that online mentoring provides a “process in which electronic media are used as the main channel of communication between the mentor and mentee” (Argento-Linares et al., 2017, p. 401).

Online mentoring has increasingly become more valuable as advancements in technology have facilitated and streamlined accessibility and connectivity (Collier, 2022; Tetzlaff et al., 2022). Recent challenges of remote work and mandated online education have also provided new opportunities and the necessity for creating trust between employees or students and instructors, building support for the sponsoring organization, and improving inclusion through online mentoring (Tu & Li, 2021). Currently, online mentoring is evolving to surpass previous paradigms, acquiring heightened prominence in the form of transformative educational and professional development strategies (Mullen, 2021). This evolution is characterized by the merging of technology with pedagogical methodologies resulting in a dynamic platform that leverages digital connectivity to foster mentor-mentee relationships (Tinoco-Giraldo et al., 2020). In this context, online mentoring encompasses a mentor’s guidance, knowledge dissemination, and personal development for the mentee through virtual channels. It also draws on online mentors’ intentional use of strategies including personal competence, availability, career planning and networking, communication, feedback, and emotional connection (Byrnes et al., 2019, p. 239). This reframing process for online mentoring capitalizes on the digital landscape's potential for immersive and collaborative learning experiences.

Advantages 

In comparison to classical mentoring, online mentoring benefits from potentials of being “boundaryless” and more “egalitarian” (Bierema & Merriam, 2002, p. 419). First, physical and logistical constraints to mentoring can be removed as mentors and mentees meet in a wider variety of locations and at a wider variety of times than might be available in a traditional office setting, such as outside, in moving vehicles, and with backdrops to hide locations or during early morning, late evening, and between other meetings.

Online mentoring also transcends geographical and cultural constraints (Bierema & Merriam, 2002; Pollard & Kumar, 2021) by providing opportunities for long-distance and international mentoring, ensuring access for students and employees worldwide that would not be possible in person with mentees and mentors in separate offices, locations, and countries. It may also help remove psychological barriers between mentees and mentors due to professional position, stature, or age, and may help improve mentoring relationships where there are potential biases of race, culture, gender, first-generation status, etc. that may cause feelings of estrangement or lack of inclusivity among professionals and students (Termini et al., 2021). Online mentoring can help level the conversational landscape for the mentee, allowing them to ask questions with more confidence and facilitating deeper engagement and active listening (Andersen & West, 2021). Working toward this goal of greater equality in mentorship fosters a sense of belonging and enhances an institution's commitment to inclusivity. 

Moreover, online mentoring can encourage self-guided learning as mentees actively use online resources and flexible interactions to explore topics they are curious about. This approach promotes independence, critical thinking, and the skill to research on one's own—all in line with modern learner-focused methods. Furthermore, online mentoring breaks down barriers and nurtures self-directed learning, making it a powerful tool for modern education (Olivier & Trivedi, 2021). Online mentoring’s focus on autonomy can enrich not only academic or workplace success for the mentee but also personal development, shaping a dynamic and vibrant learning environment. 

Constraints

There continue to be challenges to overcome in online mentoring requiring careful consideration and strategic management. Connectivity and access to reliable data remain persistent hurdles. If a mentor and mentee cannot have an uninterrupted mentoring conversation, such as via video conference or messaging due to insufficient data coverage, even the best attempts at mentoring will fail. In many countries, access to high-speed internet is an ongoing difficulty. Even with remote work and online higher education becoming more mainstream, there may also still be obstacles to virtual communication perception between mentee and mentor. Visual and auditory cues that facilitate effective interpersonal interactions in face-to-face settings may not be as readily discernible, leading to miscommunication. The efficacy of online mentoring is contingent on the technological fluency and comfort of both mentors and mentees and requires vigilant attention by both to ensure up-to-date technology skills and coherent dialogue. Individuals who are apprehensive or ill at ease with online communication platforms may struggle to derive optimal benefits from online mentoring. 

Online mentoring may also require more direction from mentors regarding online dialogue and etiquette, especially for students who are accustomed to informality in personal online communication (O’Dowd et al., 2020). Mentors may also need to connect with their mentees through multiple modalities to be most effective, which requires time and planning and is essential for cultivating robust and meaningful online mentoring relationships (Sanyal & Rigby, 2017). Cybersecurity is also an issue with online mentoring, as the possibility that interactions may not be secure might influence comfort and openness (Jan & Mahboob, 2022).  In response to these challenges, mentors must assume an essential role in guiding and shaping effective online mentoring interactions. As the realm of online mentoring continues to evolve and expand, the development of comprehensive strategies to address these challenges will be integral to realizing its full potential as an impactful learning modality. 

The Future of Online Mentoring 

Online mentoring seems positioned to become more critical to higher education and business as technology improves and as professionals, students, and society become more engaged in online learning opportunities. This trajectory underscores the growing significance of using online mentoring to foster a diversified spectrum of skills and cultural insights through global mentoring. In this growing trend of global mentoring, mentors and mentees can move beyond cultural boundaries in pursuit of enriched learning experiences and the cultivation of intercultural competence (Domer et al., 2021; Rodriguez et al., 2021). Mentors and mentees may reach out for mentoring across cultures to improve learning and connection. Benefits include finding global solutions to common challenges, developing a more diverse perspective, building global community and collaboration, especially where participants share common fields, and working together on international projects and programs (Rosser et al., 2020). Mentors and mentees must show resolve for working around barriers such as time differences, language and communication constraints, and cultural differences to achieve “intentionally global” mentoring opportunities. (Rosser et al., 2020, p. 8). More opportunities for global mentoring in business, education, and medicine are promising to enhance academic and professional proficiencies while also fostering a heightened cultural acumen that resonates with the evolving international landscape.

Artificial intelligence methods may also impact online mentoring. While a chatbot may not be able to replace the role of a skilled mentor, AI could help improve online mentoring relationships by managing administrative details such as (a) scheduling and providing resources to mentees, thus minimizing the time commitment for mentors, (b) providing learner analytics to improve how the mentor guides the mentee, and (c) helping to match mentors and mentees together (Murray et al., 2022). AI-assisted online mentoring may also offer increased access to mentoring and provide more effective mentoring to large populations and diverse, underrepresented groups (Neumann et al., 2021; Ocado et al., 2023).

As the landscape of online education continues to evolve, a collaborative relationship with online mentoring may strengthen its impact as a transformative educational modality. Connections between technological innovation, pedagogical adaptation, and cross-cultural interaction show the potential for creating a generation of students and professionals adept in both their chosen fields and global perspectives. The nexus of online mentoring thus stands ready to shape the trajectory of education, business, and other disciplines, ushering in a new era of dynamic, interconnected, and culturally astute learning and educational experiences.

References 

Andersen, C. L., & West, R. E. (2021). " We overwhelm them with hope": How online mentors can support online learners. Online Learning, 25(4), 388-415. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2440

Argente-Linares, E., Péres-López, M. C., & Ordóñez-Solana, C. (2016). Practical experience of blended mentoring in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(5), 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1273449

Bierema, L. L., & Merriam, S. B. (2002). E-mentoring: Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), 211227.

Boston, W. E., & Ice, P. (2011). Assessing facilitator performance as an influence on student satisfaction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(2), Summer 2011. 

Byrnes, D., Uribe-Flórez, L. J., Trespalacios, J., & Chilson, J. (2019). Doctoral e-mentoring: Current practices and effective strategies. Online Learning Journal, 23(1), 236-248. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1446

Collier, P. (2022). How Peer Mentoring Can Help Universities Promote Student Success in a Post-COVID19 Pandemic World. Metropolitan Universities, 33(1), 37-54.

DeWaard, H., & Chavhan, R. (2020). Cross-cultural mentoring: A pathway to building professional relationships and professional learning beyond boundaries. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14(1), 43-58.

Dorner, H., Misic, G., & Rymarenko, M. (2021). Online mentoring for academic practice: strategies, implications, and innovations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1483(1), 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14301

Ehrich, L. C., Hansford, B., & Tennent, L. (2004). Formal mentoring programs in  education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 518–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04267118 

Hamilton, B. A., & Scandura, T. A. (2003). E-Mentoring: Implications for organizational  learning and development in a wired world. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 388–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00128-6

Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature  review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505–532.

Jan, S., & Mahboob, U. (2022). Online mentoring: Challenges and strategies. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 38(8), 2272.

Mullen, C. A. (2021). Online doctoral mentoring in a pandemic: help or hindrance to academic progress on dissertations?. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 10(2), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-06-2020-0029

Murray, S. A., Shuler, H., Spencer, E. C., & Hinton, A., Jr (2022). Mentoring future science leaders to thrive. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 43(6), 457–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2022.03.012.

Neumann, A. T., Arndt, T., Köbis, L., Meissner, R., Martin, A., de Lange, P.,. . . & Wollersheim, H. W. (2021). Chatbots as a tool to scale mentoring processes: Individually supporting self-study in higher education. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 4, 668220.

O'Dowd, R., Sauro, S., & Spector‐Cohen, E. (2020). The role of pedagogical mentoring in virtual exchange. TESOL Quarterly, 54(1), 146-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.543

Olivier, J., & Trivedi, S. (2021). Self-directed Learning, Online Mentoring and Online Coaching. Radical Solutions for Education in Africa: Open Education and Self-directed Learning in the Continent, 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4099-5_5   

Okado, Y., Nye, B. D., Aguirre, A., & Swartout, W. Can Virtual Agents Scale Up Mentoring?: Insights from College Students' Experiences Using the CareerFair. ai Platform at an American Hispanic-Serving Institution. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: 24th International Conference, AIED 2023, Tokyo, Japan, July 3–7, 2023, Proceedings (p. 189). Springer Nature.

Pollard, R., & Kumar, S. (2021). Mentoring graduate students online: Strategies and challenges. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 267-284.

Rodríguez, D. C., Jessani, N. S., Zunt, J., Ardila-Gómez, S., Muwanguzi, P. A., Atanga, S. N.,. . . & Nasuuna, E. (2021). Experiential learning and mentorship in Global Health leadership programs: capturing lessons from across the globe. Annals of global health, 87(1).

Rosser, E., Buckner, E., Avedissian, T., Cheung, D. S. K., Eviza, K., Hafsteinsdóttir, T. B.,. . . & Waweru, S. (2020). The Global Leadership Mentoring Community: building capacity across seven global regions. International Nursing Review, 67(4), 484-494.

Sanyal, C., & Rigby, C. (2017). E-mentoring as a HRD intervention: An exploratory  action research study within an international professional mentoring scheme. Human Resource Development International, 20(1), 18–36. doi: 10.1080/13678868.2016.1220156 

Termini, C. M., Hinton, A. O., Jr, Garza-López, E., Koomoa, D. L., Davis, J. S., & Martínez-Montemayor, M. M. (2021). Building Diverse Mentoring Networks that Transcend Boundaries in Cancer Research. Trends in Cancer, 7(5), 385–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2021.01.001

Tinoco-Giraldo, H., Torrecilla Sanchez, E. M., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2020). E-mentoring in higher education: A structured literature review and implications for future research. Sustainability, 12(11), 4344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114344 

Tetzlaff, J., Lomberk, G., Smith, H. M., Agrawal, H., Siegel, D. H., & Apps, J. N. (2022). Adapting mentoring in times of crisis: what we learned from COVID-19. Academic Psychiatry, 46(6), 774-779. 

Tu, M., & Li, M. (2021). What great mentorship looks like in a hybrid workplace. Harvard Business Review.

Whiting, V. R., & de Jansz, S. C. (2004). Mentoring in the 21st century: Using the internet to build skills and networks. Journal of Management Education, 28(3), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903252639