Throughout this book, a basic premise has been that instructional librarians enable library users to make better use of information than many library users can typically do on their own. This premise is central to the acknowledgement that librarians assume multiple roles including advocate, coordinator, instructional designer, leader, lifelong learner, teacher, and teaching partner. To maintain and expand knowledge, practices, and skills relevant and useful in an ever-changing society where information continues to increase and new, advanced computer technologies continuously become available, instructional librarians must accept the responsibilities as life-long learners and be prepared with up-to-date knowledge and abilities if they are to remain relevant and useful.
To
be perfectly clear about the importance of life-long learning in librarianship
regardless of the position a library professional holds, it is not enough to
earn an academic degree, such as the Master of Library Science or the Master of
Library and Information Science, and then end participation in specialized
educational opportunities. Through professional development education featuring
evidence-based strategies and skills to assist library users in utilizing
library resources and services effectively and efficiently and in development
of information literacy skills, library professionals can stay current to serve
library users with diverse information needs.
There
is no time like the present to focus, anticipate, plan, or continue planning,
as the case may be, your own professional development journey using the unique
features of self-directed professional learning. The purpose of this chapter is
to encourage pre- and in-service instructional librarians to take action and
responsibilities for continuous learning that involves connections to high
performing learning environments that is relevant to people in today's society,
respectful and responsive to all stakeholders, and rigorous enough to
facilitate your professional growth and learning in a rapidly changing world.
You will be introduced to a model for self-directed professional development
that has the capacity to result in all this and more. First, we share some important
reasons why independent learning is necessary in professional development that
results in high impact library instruction.
To
get started, here are four essential questions (Wiggins & McTighe, 2013) we
ask you to consider while reading this chapter:
EQ1. What are driving forces that lead to the need for continuous self-directed professional development?
EQ2. Why are independent learning strategies important for instructional librarian’s continuous professional growth?
EQ3. How do the Five Rs (relationships, relevance, responsive culture, rigor, and results) inform an active, independent cycle of improvement?
EQ4. Using the Five Rs Framework, what professional goals are now your priority as a life-long learner?
As adult learners with specializations in library and information science, self-directed professional development projects beyond those experienced in degree seeking programs must be highly deliberate and self-planned efforts. Long and Associates (2000) described deliberate, self-planned efforts as occurring from “a consequence of a complex interaction of personal variables and circumstances” (p. 14) such as social influences, financial constraints, information access, and prior knowledge. As Louws et al. (2017) point out, self-directed learning occurs as educators direct their learning informed by challenges and opportunities they experience in practice, organization climates, recent experiences, and national and local policies. Instructional librarians must be open-minded to learning new things and willing to try new skills sometimes right along with the library users.
8.1.1 Importance of Independent Learning
In
today’s digital world, library professionals must be willing to quickly adapt
to the use of new computer technologies and tools. Professional development
participation is key to necessary adaptation of new computer technologies and
skills. Toward instructional success in digital environments, Lehrman (2023)
recommends that educators abandon traditional methods of professional
development that tend to promote dependent learning in lieu of independent
learning strategies that are “nonlinear learning, leveraging community, and
prioritizing practicality” (p. 130). Lehrman asserts that effective adult
learning should be within a “culture of experimentation where educators build
and navigate their own learning path” (p. 133).
The
importance of independent learning through self-directed professional learning
was also affirmed in a recent study by Irgatoğlui (2021) who investigated the
relationship between professional development attitudes, activities, and
self-directed learning readiness of English language instructors. Irgatoğlui
asserted, based on study participant scores on the Fisher et al. (2001)
Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale, that “high self-directed readiness
levels are very valuable as they have the potential to contribute significantly
to both individual and organizational learning” (p. 131). According to
Irgatoğlui, self-directed learning readiness skills refers to the learner’s
abilities to set targets for learning and their abilities to independently
“start, prepare, execute, and track their learning at various stages” (p. 134)
of learning.
Maestas
(2023) recently investigated the self-directed learning of school librarians
through the lens of the person, process, context model by Hiemstra and Brockett
(2012). Maestas, too, affirmed the importance of independent rather than
dependent learning through self-directed professional learning. Findings
indicated that participants in the study frequently set goals for meeting their
immediate needs, based on perceptions of future needs, or to further their
skills as a librarian. They also set goals to increase their knowledge of
particular instructional purposes such as increasing their research skills,
gaining knowledge of formal writing styles, increasing knowledge of primary
sources, preparing for book challenges, and technology repairs. Maestas
concluded that school librarians’ self-directed learning goals focused on the
immediate needs of students and building staff, and school librarians remained
relevant, and in many cases indispensable, through their continuous
self-directed professional learning as opposed to school district-provided professional
development.
When professional growth
involves self-directed learning, the learner sets professional learning goals
for themselves, as opposed to accepting goals determined by another person
or entity in one’s professional life. Too often, for example, when educators are required to attend group professional development, sessions are planned and delivered from a one-size-fits-all mindset. There are likely to be other good models
for determining and outlining self-directed professional goals. One such model (below)
was shared by the Kansas State Department of Education in the Kansas
Education Systems Accreditation Fact Sheet (2018) and was designed to create change,
is clear, and worthwhile in its capacity to move thinking about goals in
several important intellectual areas. While this model was initially intended
for use by K-12 educators including librarians, it is a model that will likely
well serve all library professionals, especially instructional librarians in
all library types.
(Revised: 6-22-2018)
It is a safe assumption, as
pointed out already in this book, that nearly all work by library professionals
involves some form of instruction. Therefore, professional growth in
instruction, especially for instructional librarians, will be important
throughout your career as a formally educated librarian. In the following
sections, each of the five goal areas has been adapted for instructional
librarianship with examples of how each goal area can be adapted for
instructional librarianship.
A state of interconnectedness
exists among people, information literacy curriculum, library programs,
projects, and library communities. Relationships with people are critical in
establishing connections that result in high performing learning environments.
Think of relationships with co-workers, personnel within departments or other
libraries, professionals in other agencies, consumers of library services
(particularly college students), etc.
A. Example Relationship Goal: During fall, spring, and summer sessions, I
will meet, talk with, and build professional relationships with three different
experienced instructional librarians as we discuss current instructional issues
and opportunities.
B.
Example Relationship Goal: Each semester, I will email content
faculty reminding them of my availability to teach information literacy skills
to students enrolled in their courses.
There is the power and significance when specific sources and services meet information needs of their user. Relevance through power and significance of source and services is necessary to strengthen college student’s motivation and allow learning to become more engaging, empowering, connected, applicable to everyday life skills, and socially significant. Think of a relevance goals as goals that pertains to curriculum development, implementation of instruction, student engagement, and computer technology use.
A. Example Relevance Goal – Each academic year, I will conduct an information needs assessment of new college students.
B. Example Relevance Goal – Each semester I will review and revise lesson plans as needed based on feedback from students.
As an instructional librarian,
if you are responsive, you are one who readily reacts to suggestions,
influences, appeals, effects, or opportunities. Being responsive empowers
librarians to become respectful of, responsible for, and involved in learning,
the learning process, and the learning community.
A. Example Responsiveness Goal – I will act on items in my current performance evaluation report.
B. Example Responsiveness Goal – I will attend community of
practice meetings to learn instructional suggestions by other librarians.
When instructional librarians
act with thoroughness, consistency, and accuracy, they are engaged in a
relentless pursuit of rigor that challenges and provides opportunities to
demonstrate growth and learning. Rigor is
essential in addressing the needs of a rapidly expanding society and world. In
education, including libraries, something is rigorous if it is thought of as
high quality and if it appropriately challenges the learning audience.
A. Example Rigor Goal – I
will apply best practices identified in five recent library and information
publications (e.g., journal articles, webinars, blog articles, professional
development workshop materials, etc.).
B. Example Rigor Goal – I will prepare and schedule virtual
and non-virtual sessions for students on the topic of APA writing rules and
mechanics.
Where there are results, there
is observable evidence of growth and learning in students. Results are realized
when instruction is delivered in a timely fashion based on the needs and
desires of individual college students. Results are discovered through various
forms of assessment and provide the data and information necessary to fuel
instruction and empower learning.
A. Example Results Goal –
I will use assessment data to modify my lesson plans.
B. Example Results Goal – I will explain assignment
competencies responding to students questions in advance of lessons.
Featured items are opportunities for pre- and in-service instructional librarians to engage in intellectual exercises extending chapter content that may challenge your thinking and encourage additional practices in instructional librarianship.
Educators,
including instructional librarians, are often asked to be reflective
practitioners who think about their actions for the benefit of continuous
learning. Self-reflection can be
helpful, and may even be necessary, in the process of self-directed
professional learning.
This
exercise is an opportunity for you to do some everyday reflection that can be
about positive or negative experiences. This reflection can occur any time, any
place, and for any reason. It can be formal or written - either form can add
value to your learning.
Keep
in mind that reflective writing does not occur naturally for everyone. For some, reflective writing takes practice.
In anticipation of writing self-directed professional goals, please make time for self-reflection. Please start by reading the Study Skills guide provided by the University of Cambridge. Then, follow the instructions in the Reflective Writing Exercise. Try out the provided formula to write a short reflective piece using the three what’s and a two, three, four sentence structure.
How
did you do? As you can, please discuss
being a reflective practitioner with co-workers and/or classmates. How will you
be intentional about engaging in reflective thinking and/or writing?
After
reading this chapter, return to section 8.2 The Five Rs Model for Writing
Self-directed Goals and read it again. Then, using the chart below, please
write 3 goals for yourself in each of the five areas. Make a commitment through your employment
evaluation process and/or your own personal accountability process to regularly
review this written chart of goals and determine where you are in the process.
Once a goal is successfully achieved, replace it with a new goal.
How
is self-directed learning going for you?
As you can, please discuss self-directed learning with co-workers and/or
classmates. How will you be intentional about engaging in self-directed
professional learning?
FRAMEWORK: 5 Rs
KESA Five Rs Framework | My Goals from _________ to _______. |
1. Relationship Goal | 1. 2. 3. |
2. Relevance Goal | 1. 2. 3. |
3. Responsiveness Goal | 1. 2. 3. |
4. Rigor Goal | 1. 2. 3. |
5. Results Goal | 1. 2. 3. |
Fisher, M., King, J., Tague,
G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing
education. Nurse Education Today, 21(7), 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0589
Irgatoğlu, A. (2021).
Exploring the relationship between professional development attitudes, activities and self-directed learning readiness of EFL instructors. International
Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.8
Kansas State Department of Education. (2018). Kansas Education Systems Accreditation, Framework: The Five Rs. https://ksde.org/Portals/0/TLA/Accreditation/Accreditation%20Model/Accreditation%20CURR%20LDRS%2010-10-2014.pdf
Kansas State Department of Education. (2018). Kansas Education Systems Accreditation (KESA) Factsheet. https://www.ksde.org/Portals/0/TLA/Accreditation/KESA%20Fact%20Sheet%20-%20September%202018.pdf
Lehrman, J. (2023).
Unlocking the Power of Technology: A Professional Development (Pd) Approach for
Adult Educators in the Digital Age. COABE Journal: The Resource for
Adult Education, 12(2), 130–133. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=source%3a%22COABE+Journal%3a+The+Resource+for+Adult+Education%22&id=EJ1408586
Long,
H. B., & Associates. (2000). Practice and theory in self-directed
learning. Motorola University Press.
Louws,
M. L., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & van Driel, J. H. (2017). Teachers’
self-directed learning and teaching experience: What, how, and why teachers
want to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, p. 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.004
Maestas,
M. (2023). Self-Directed Professional Learning of School
Librarians (Order No. 30566354). Emporia State University ProQuest
Dissertations Publishing.
Cambridge University Libraries. (n.d.). Study
Skills. University of Cambridge. https://libguides.cam.ac.uk/reflectivepracticetoolkit/writingexercise
This content is provided to you freely by EdTech Books.
Access it online or download it at https://edtechbooks.org/high_impact_instructional_librarianship/chapter_eight_selfdirected_professional_learning.