Instructional librarians have many responsibilities when it comes to delivering information literacy skills instruction to people in today’s society where access and use of information is central to quality of life. In addition to being knowledgeable of library resources and services, instructional librarians must be experienced with advanced information and technology competencies. Instructional librarians need to plan various engagement and instructional activities with library users. For implementation of scheduled instruction and/or programs, lesson planning is an excellent approach to prepare the librarian to teach effectively, check for understanding, and evaluate participants’ satisfaction with learning opportunities. Lesson planning is in sharp contrast to deciding what to teach five minutes before a lesson, or program, and simply talking off the top of your head so to speak about whatever is on your mind at that particular time.
There are many good approaches to lesson planning that have proven to be useful. Librarians who are educated as teachers experience formal education in best practices for lesson planning. Other librarians may have awareness of lesson plans because they have likely been beneficiaries of formal lesson planning by their teachers who delivered instruction in many subject areas. However, becoming informed about high impact, information literacy lesson plans that build a growth mindset in library users is crucial for excellence in information literacy instruction. Becoming well-prepared to create lesson plans to guide information literacy instruction in virtual and non-virtual learning environments requires consideration of and plans for learning outcomes, materials, learning process and activities, assessment, and evaluation.
In this chapter, the focus is specifically on lesson plans for teaching information literacy skills in all library types. The terms lesson, session, and program are all used interchangeably to indicate learning events in a particular library type. Highlighted in this chapter are types of details to include in lesson plans, examples of learning outcome statements, and some examples of information literacy lesson plan templates.
As you read about lesson planning, please reflect on past experiences and/or imagine future occasions to deliver high impact library instruction. Please keep in mind that teaching information literacy skills is a high impact practice in instructional librarianship when library users engage with librarians in meaningful, active information seeking practices and processes that benefit library users’ information needs including fulfilling academic and personal challenges and opportunities. High impact instructional practices are those that benefit individuals through intellectual growth and positively changed behaviors in areas of everyday life information seeking (Dow, 2024, Hovious, 2018, Case & Givens, 2016; Savolainen, 2010) and across many contexts including home, college, workplace, and recreation.
Please view this chapter as an opportunity to begin creating plans for teaching information literacy skills and to develop your own best practices for continuous review and revision of plans that may be used multiple times.
Here are three essential questions (Wiggins & McTighe, 2013) to consider while reading this chapter:
EQ1. What is the relationship between information literacy learning and quality of life in a democratic society?
EQ2. What are the benefits of creating and using lesson plans?
EQ3. What are consequences of being unconcerned about library instruction effectiveness?
Baking a cake and teaching library
users have in common that they both need a detailed plan for doing
something. When baking a cake, a recipe serves as a plan to tell the baker
in advance what is necessary and provides a set of directions with a list of
ingredients for making or preparing the cake and a formula to a desired end.
Failing to follow the recipe is likely to result in a cake that flops and is
inedible. In this case, the only outcome of attempted cake baking is a big mess
to clean up, which was not intended.
As in baking, in library
instruction a lesson plan serves as a plan to tell the teacher what is
necessary in advance and lists everything that is going to happen during the
lesson, including the goal of the lesson, teaching strategies, materials,
procedure, and the mode of assessment of understandings and learning by lesson
participants. Failure to create or follow a lesson plan with all the necessary
parts can result in an ineffective session, or program, and dissatisfied
participants for the instructional librarian to somehow appease. In the
long run and more importantly, an outcome of ineffective information skills
instruction results in people relying on social media posts or searching the
open Web for useful information that is insufficient.
A lesson plan is an instructional
librarian’s guide for what participants need to learn, how it will be taught,
and instructional activities (Benjes-Small & Miller, 2017). Except
when teaching a for-credit course, for example, librarians are not likely to
see the same library user participants in their session or program multiple
times. In this way, the instructional session is a one-time opportunity
to increase understanding and to initiate and/or improve information literacy
skills. Also, measuring learning in library instruction in public, special, or
government libraries is not likely possible in the traditional sense of
cumulative evaluation of learning most often experienced when students are
enrolled in for-credit hours. These library realities have an impact on the way
that lesson plans are created and used in instructional librarianship.
In instructional librarianship,
the most effective lesson or program plans have a target audience of
participants in mind and incorporate key sections suitably organized in a
lesson plan template. Effective lessons have typically been tried, reviewed, improved,
and used again. Lesson plans should be designed within the scope of
instructional strategies relevant to the teacher’s commitment to exercising
particular teaching methods and relevant strategies (please review Chapter 5.2,
Pedagogical Choices). When instructional librarians are instrumental in
creating learning environments that promote diversity, equity, inclusion and
belonging, what and how they teach to accomplish academic and everyday
information seeking behaviors should be articulated in terms of information
literacy skills that contribute to quality of life for all. We recommend that
lesson plans in any format include these sections:
A lesson plan should begin with a
title and brief description of the lesson or program. The title serves to
declare the nature of the instructional event. A description provides a context
for participant learning and enables participants to know whether or not they
are appropriately suited for the learning experience.
Learning outcome statements make
clear the teacher’s values in the field of librarianship and what the teacher
anticipates that engaged participants will be able to do following the lesson.
This level of detail enables prospective participants to know what to expect.
Stated learning outcomes also enable the teacher to make decisions about the
content to be included in the lesson.
The use of learning outcomes in
lesson planning is not without its critics who prefer earlier liberal forms of
education that were less structured, with less training of students and more
dialogue (Roger & Clayton, 2019). More dialogue means that there is a great
deal of lesson time devoted to discussion with little or no lesson time devoted
to teaching skills. While it is likely impossible to determine everything that
participants will take away from the instruction, learning outcomes serve to ground
the teacher in focused statements indicating what the teacher will teach in a
given session, what the participants should concentrate on and accomplish, and enable
the teacher to determine what to observe in participant behaviors and products
that indicates achievement, or lack of achievement, of the outcome.
Learning outcome statements,
sometimes called learning objectives, should be results specific, observable,
measurable, relevant to the participants, and accomplishable either as a simple
or complex, more advanced task. Below are some examples by library types of
information literacy learning outcomes statements.
Public Library | At the end of the one-hour program, participants will be able to:
|
Academic Library |
At the end of the 90-minute session, participants will be able to:
|
School Library |
At the end of the one-hour session held in the library’s makerspace, participants will be able to:
|
Special Library |
At the end of the session, participants will be able to:
|
Government Library |
At the end of the two-hour session, participants will be able to:
|
Whether teaching preK-12 students
or a continuing professional development lesson, there are likely to be
standards, certificates, or licensure requirements. If so, each information
literacy lesson that is taught should address information literacy skills that
align to those requirements. When requirements are included in a lesson plan,
they are a quick reference to communicate that you are teaching exact local,
state, or national standards.
While the learning outcomes
establish what the instructional librarian will be able to observe in
participants’ visible actions when using information literacy skills, the
content section of the lesson plan identifies the topic and concepts relevant
to the skills. Content serves to educate participants about how to think about
the big picture associated with information literacy. For example, if
teaching how to avoid plagiarism by properly citing in- and end-of-text
sources, the content may be publications addressing intellectual property
rights. If instructing library users about how to apply for a passport, the
content of the session might begin with explaining trusted, authoritative
sources, then moving into publications about adult and travel documents for
children or about U. S. citizens traveling abroad available on the USA.Gov website. While there may not be time
for a long lecture about content, well-prepared teachers can present meaningful
contexts and compelling key points that elicit interest and motivation to learn,
and continue learning.
In the past, teachers of all kinds,
including instructional librarians, have been consumed with preparing and
presenting instructional materials in paper formats. Paper materials were time
consuming to prepare, transport, and distribute. Today’s instructional
librarians are most effective and relevant in today’s information society when
they make use of electronic tools and digital resources relevant to learning
experiences. As early as primary school, students have laptop computers and
access to electronic portals where classroom teachers and librarians share
documents that can be accessed and used at school or from home. It is also
possible to use the Digital
Backpack, a free service offered by BlinkLearning, to purchase digital
books for the school year.
Throughout life, use of digital
devices appears to be the preference of many people of all ages. It is
important to keep the door open, so to speak, to preparing and use of materials
printed on paper available as necessary even though electronic materials have
become the norm. Having materials in the most appropriate format for all
library users is typically best accomplished when the instructional librarian
makes every effort to know the audience as much as possible in advance of
creating the lesson plan.
Indicating in the lesson plan
specifically what content resources and or tools are needed in a lesson is a
crucial part of being prepared to deliver instruction. Listing in the lesson
plan all that will be included and used during a particular session or program
and double-checking accessibility ensures that the learning process will not be
disrupted. Making certain that all materials are accessible to individuals with
disabilities and to people for whom English is not their primary language is
accomplished ideally when creating and using a lesson plan.
In the process and procedure
section, set out a path for clear execution of the session or program. It is
worthwhile to outline details in steps to be taken and main points to be
emphasized. Steps should be articulated in terms of how the teacher will engage
participants and make use of materials. Main points to be emphasized when
teaching information literacy skills should address specifics about information
and technology use, for example, information authority, internet safety,
digital citizenship, citing sources, intellectual property and plagiarism, and
privacy. Also, it is important to identify teaching methods considering stages
and activities in the information search process (please review Chapter 5.4).
Assessment of learning is tricky
when the instructional librarian only teaches brief sessions and only has one opportunity
to influence learning. Assessment of learning is also challenging even in a
for-credit course due to the nature of the kinds and types of information
exercises participants are asked to do. Additionally, in public, special and
government libraries, checking for understanding as learning takes place may be
the only possibility. In any case, it is worthwhile for the instructional
librarian to make every effort to determine how well learning is taking place
and what altered or further instruction is needed. In all library types, it
would be irresponsible and unethical to teach without being accountable for
what is taught and learned, or not.
Formative and summative assessment
are two different yet worthwhile forms of assessment (Dixson & Worrell,
2016). Formative assessment provides opportunities for participants to reflect
on their learning and understandings by assessing themselves, and it is a
strategy for teachers to gather information about accuracy or depth of
understanding as instruction is taking place and to provide immediate feedback.
Using formative assessment, teachers cam, as necessary, adjust instruction on-the-spot
to improve student learning. Instructional librarians may facilitate
participants’ reflection by asking questions at various points in an
instructional session or program.
So far, what is the clearest or most confusing point?
What is the most important part of the session today?
What did you learn today?
What is something you still have questions about?
Another formative assessment
strategy is sometimes referred to as an “exit ticket” (Dixson & Worrell,
2016, p. 155) designed to ask participants at the end of the session to write
down their response to a teacher-posed question and hand it in when departing
the session. Even if the participants will not be returning for a second
session, the teacher can benefit from reading responses when reviewing and
revising a lesson plan before using it again. While the exit ticket strategy
originated in non-virtual classrooms, it can be adapted to assessment in
virtual environments.
Summative assessment is typically
considered a more formalized strategy for judging participants’ performance on
learning outcomes stated in the lesson plan. Examples of summative assessments
are teacher-made exams, standardized tests, and term papers, which are
infrequently done in library instruction. However, performance-based
summative assessment is an opportunity for participants to demonstrate their
learning with a final product or demonstration of a performance of a skill or
task.
Whether assessment is planned to
occur during or at the end of instruction, it is important for instructional
librarians to be mindful of their goals for assessment. Is the goal of
assessment:
·
checking for participant
understanding?
·
determining participants’
readiness to use an information literacy skill or undertake an
information-related task?
·
learning participants’
overall satisfaction with the session or program?
·
to gather data that can be
used by the librarian in their job performance evaluation?
During creation of a lesson plan
is the best time to decide when and what assessment strategy to use to be
accurate in determining quality of participant learning.
In all library types involving
adults, instruction should be evaluated by participants. This is not to suggest
that the reactions/responses to library instruction by children and/or youth
are not important or worthwhile - they are important, too, and should be taken
seriously. However, adults’ reactions and responses should be utilized to
determine instructional effectiveness and to inform future instructional
opportunities. Asking participants to anonymously provide their responses to
open-ended questions may prove to be the best approach to gathering honest
input. Useful open-ended questions are those designed with all respondents in
mind to communicate with the teacher using their own words.
What did
you hope to discover and/or learn in this session?
In your
opinion, how well was the session presented?
What
other topic or skills would you like to learn about in future sessions?
At least one question designed for evaluation at specific levels is useful, particularly when counting the total number of participants and quantifying their evaluation from high to low (e.g., excellent; satisfactory; unsatisfactory; not acceptable. For example:
How do
you rate the quality of the librarian’s instruction?
______
Excellent (tops)
______
Satisfactory (good enough)
______
Unsatisfactory (needs improvement)
______
Not acceptable (not again)
When writing a lesson plan is a good time to determine exactly what questions will serve the purpose of the evaluation at a particular point in time. It is also a good idea to keep in mind that some adult participants in sessions cannot identify their information needs and are not the best judge of what they need or of instructional effectiveness. Nevertheless, it is worthwhile to stay positive about inviting participant evaluations, assuming that everyone in the audience is a good participant who wants to learn.
7.2 Example Lesson Plan Templates
A lesson plan template is a form that outlines a pattern including all the necessary parts of a lesson plan. Instructional librarians are likely to create a template of their won that works well for them. To assist the busy instructional librarian, this template below is a good option.
Title and Description | |
Learning Outcome(s) | |
Related Requirements | |
Content and Materials | |
Process Procedure | |
Assessment Method | |
Evaulation Criteria |
Session Steps | Step Name | Activity | Time | Supporting Theories |
#1 Step | ||||
#2 Step | ||||
#3 Step | ||||
#4 Step | ||||
#5 Step | ||||
#6 Step | ||||
#7 Step |
At the end of this chapter in section 7.5, there
are some lesson plan examples created by practicing librarians. Each one
details plans for realistic information literacy learning in authentic library
situations with a likely target audience. Lesson plans such as these improve
overtime as lessons are taught, reviewed, and revised based on availability of
new information and technology that is added to the library’s collection and/or
services and the librarian’s awareness of ever changing and evolving
information needs of library users.
Featured items are opportunities
for pre- and in-service instructional librarians to engage in intellectual
exercises extending chapter content that may challenge thinking and encourage
additional practices in instructional librarianship.
Please review differences in the
essential questions and non-essential questions in the table below. Also, we
recommend reading “The
Second Principle,” The work of Leslie Owen Wilson, Ed.D.
Then, based on Chapter Seven
content, please respond to each essential question in the left column below.
Reflect on details and patterns in the chapter content. Fit pieces of the
puzzle together as you dig deep into lesson planning for instructional
librarianship. When writing, provide support, rationale, and/or justification
for your responses.
Essential Questions | NOT Essential Questions |
What is the relationship between information literacy learning and quality of life in a democratic society? | What are some information literacy skills learning outcomes? |
What are benefits of creating and using lesson plans? | What are some information literacy skills learning outcomes? |
What are consequences of being unconcerned about library instruction effectiveness? | What is evaluation criteria? |
Please review the example learning
outcomes provided in this chapter. Then, identify and state the audience for
the lesson, session, or program. For the stated library type of your choice,
please practice writing one, two, or three learning outcomes for a 50-minute
lesson.
Library Type | Target Audience | Learning Outcomes Statement |
Public | ||
Academic | ||
School (K-12) | ||
Special | ||
Government |
Review each of your learning outcomes statements asking these questions:
If any of the above questions cannot be positively answered, please reword the learning outcome statement.
Once finished, please collaborate (give and receive information) with a classmate or practicing instructional librarian who is knowledgeable about writing learning outcome statements and will participate in a conversation wherein you are open minded as you collect and extract additional information. Listen for feedback and continue to collaborate as you collect, extract, and verify information.
Using the content and resources in
this chapter, please create an information literacy learning lesson plan based
on a realistic instructional event in the library type of your choice. Then,
practice teaching the lesson. Record a video of your practice teaching. Watch
the view and complete this self-evaluation and brief reflection. What did
you discover about using the plan? About teaching? About where you need to
practice and improve?
Instructions: Put a mark in
the box that you feel most accurately describes your instructional librarian
teaching of information literacy skills abilities at this point.
Elements of Successful Lesson Plan | Well-Done | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement |
Clear objective (learning outcomes) for the lesson | |||
Specific teaching/learning activities to achieve the learning outcomes | |||
Method(s) of measuring student understandings | |||
Handouts shared electronically | |||
Technology necessary for lesson | |||
Utilization of space for the teacher to be appropriately situated in the video | |||
Introduce yourself briefly providing your background | |||
Begin by talking about learning outcomes. What is the purpose of the lesson? What do you hope the students will accomplish? | |||
Provide your contact information; explain best ways to engage with you (the librarian) in real-time | |||
Appeal to students; try to make connections to students in positive ways by relating to them | |||
Be organized; have strong understanding of your resources and concepts | |||
Balance instruction with the learning activities; respect student’s cognitive load limitations | |||
Check for learning (in virtual or non-virtual environment); invite students to contact you; point out additional resources |
Write a reflection (50-100 words
maximum) about what you are learning about teaching a lesson. For example:
“I
discovered that…”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Do you have a lesson plan created
in a template that is resulting in participant successes in learning and using
information literacy skills? Would you like to share it in this chapter?
Please send it to the authors for their consideration.
Benjes-Small, C., & Miller, R.
K. (2017). The new instruction librarian: A workbook for trainers and learners. ALA
Editions.
Case, D. O., & Givens, L. M.
(2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information
seeking, needs, and behavior (4th ed.). Emerald Group
Publishing.
Dixson, D. D. & Worrell, F. C.
(2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55,
153-159.
Dow, M. J. (2024). High impact learning experiences and
changed behaviors in college students: A systematic review with implications
for information literacy. Journal for Education of Library and Information
Science. In-press.
Hovious, A. (2018). Toward a
socio-contextual understanding of transliteracy. Reference Services Review,
46(2), 178-188.
Roger, H., & Clayton, B.
(2019). The current emphasis on learning outcomes. International Journal of
Training Research, 17(21), 93-97.
Savolainen, R. (2010). Everyday life information seeking. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
Note: The following lesson plans are shared with permission from their creators.
By Devin Ortiz-Hoffman
Lesson Title: Introduction to Libby for Public Library Patrons
Lesson Description: This is an introduction to familiarize public library patrons with Libby, by OverDrive, a reading app that allows the library systems to provide digital content (eBooks, eAudiobooks, and eMagazines).
Learning Outcomes:
At the end of the 50-minute program, participants will be able to:
1. recognize 3-5 benefits of using public library resources and services.
2. use Libby (by OverDrive for public libraries) website to process borrow, read online, and holds of electronic resources.
3. select, borrow, read online, and/or hold one or more items of their personal choice from the library’s collection of eBooks, eAudiobooks, and eMagazines.
Materials
• Instructor and participant electronic devices (computers or tablets) with Internet connectivity
• Library credentials (library card number and PIN)
• Welcome to Libby handout (takeaway)
• Pens and/or pencils, note paper
Activity worksheet (participant assessment):
By Michelle Karlinsey
By Mindy Westerman
This content is provided to you freely by EdTech Books.
Access it online or download it at https://edtechbooks.org/high_impact_instructional_librarianship/chapter_six_lesson_planning_implementation_and_assessment.